Autodeal Car Comparison
Ford Ranger 2.0 Bi-Turbo Wildtrak 4x4 AT vs. Toyota Tamaraw 2.0 Aluminum Cargo MT
You can still add another car for comparison
AddToyota Tamaraw 2.0 Aluminum Cargo MT is the cheapest
Engine Size
2.0 L
2.0 L
1,996 cc
1,998 cc
4
4
16
16
10-Speed automatic
5- Speed Manual
Ford Ranger 2.0 Bi-Turbo Wildtrak 4x4 AT and Toyota Tamaraw 2.0 Aluminum Cargo MT have the same engine sizes
Ford Ranger 2.0 Bi-Turbo Wildtrak 4x4 AT is more powerful
Ford Ranger 2.0 Bi-Turbo Wildtrak 4x4 AT has more pulling power />
*estimated
Diesel
Gasoline
Euro 4
n/a
80 L
n/a
Ford Ranger 2.0 Bi-Turbo Wildtrak 4x4 AT is more fuel efficient
*estimated
5,370 mm
4,965 mm
1,918 mm
1,695 mm
1,884 mm
2,180 mm
3,270 mm
2,750 mm
13 m
10 m
235 mm
n/a
n/a
n/a
4
2
5
2
Ford Ranger 2.0 Bi-Turbo Wildtrak 4x4 AT is longer
Ford Ranger 2.0 Bi-Turbo Wildtrak 4x4 AT is wider
Toyota Tamaraw 2.0 Aluminum Cargo MT is taller
Ford Ranger 2.0 Bi-Turbo Wildtrak 4x4 AT has a large wheelbase
Ford Ranger 2.0 Bi-Turbo Wildtrak 4x4 AT has a longer deck
Ford Ranger 2.0 Bi-Turbo Wildtrak 4x4 AT has a wider deck
Ford Ranger 2.0 Bi-Turbo Wildtrak 4x4 AT has a taller deck
Ford Ranger 2.0 Bi-Turbo Wildtrak 4x4 AT has a larger payload capacity
Toyota Tamaraw 2.0 Aluminum Cargo MT has a tighter turning circle
18 in
14 in
Dual-Zone Electronic Automatic Temperature Control
Rear Aircon
12" Colored Portrait Touchscreen
2DIN
5 Years (150,000 km)
n/a
n/a
n/a
Important: AutoDeal.com.ph aims to provide the most accurate and updated vehicle information as possible. However, please note that vehicle specifications, prices, and images may be changed by the manufacturers and dealerships without prior notice. If you spot a potential mistake, feel free to contact us at info@autodeal.com.ph.
Car Comparison
Compare thousands of cars available in the Philippines and find out which has the best performance, safety equipment or economy and much more.
Looking into expanding your business? Check out these commercial vehicles to help you decide.